October 24, 2023

Procurement from Chinese Companies through GeM Portal in India

GeM (Government e-Marketplace) is a national public procurement platform. This is an online platform designed specifically for the government departments and government companies for any kind of procurement. Government bodies, i.e., Central Government, State Government, Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and municipal bodies, are required to place through tender on GeM and all eligible suppliers are free to submit quotations for such tender.

Also, all kinds of overseas supplies are also routed through GeM. It was developed by the Directorate General of Supplies and Disposals (DGS&D) under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry. In July 2020, Government restricted bidders from countries sharing land border with India from submitting their quotations. Recently, government has made certain amendments related to procurement from Chinese companies.

This article contains a detailed insight of how amended provisions have affected Cheiense bidders on GeM portal:

1. Restriction on procurement from Countries sharing land border with India

From July, 2020 onwards, Government has restricted free overseas movement of goods and services from the countries sharing land borders with India through a amendment in General Financial Rules
Post such amendment, GeM portal has removed hundreds of Chinese companies and vendors from GeM platform. This move was taken post physical stand-off at LAC.
Companies having Chinese beneficiaries have also been removed from GeM Portal.
As per amended provisions, only those companies from land sharing border countries can participate on GeM portal only if they are registered with a competent authority.
Competent authority is a registration committee constituted by the Department of Promotion of Industry and Commerce (DPIIT).
Under the new guidelines registration requirements include political and security clearance from the Ministry of External Affairs and Ministry of Home Affairs.
The move has impacted electronic products including laptops, desktops, medical devices.
Under the new GeM rules all suppliers are required to obtain certification from vendors that they are compliant with the order.

2. Procurement from Chinese Companies from GeM portal

Post amendment of General Terms and Conditions of GeM portal, Chinese companies are having doubt whether there is any means available for chinese company to supply goods or services through GeM Portal.

With respect to same, one need to refer Clause 26 of General Terms and Conditions on GeM 4.0 (Version 1.12). Clause 26 specifies Restrictions on procurement from a bidder of a country which shares a land border with India.

As per Clause 26, following are the restrictions:

Any bidder from the country sharing land border with India shall be allowed to supply through GeM Portal only if the bidder is registered with Competent authority . Therefore, there is no blanket ban for chinese companies. However, they are first required to register with the Competent Authority.

Definition of bidder is very broad and it includes firm or company, consortium, Joint venture, every artificial juridical person including any agency branch participating in a procurement process.

Entities controlled directly or indirectly by the entities located in countries sharing land border with India will be covered under this clause and will get registered with competent authority first.

“Controlling ownership interest” means ownership of or entitlement to more than 25% of shares capital of the company;

“Control” shall include the right to appoint majority of the directors or to control the management or policy decisions including by virtue of their shareholding or management rights or shareholders agreements or voting agreements;

An Indian (or other) agent of such an entity is also covered under this clause.

The registration shall be valid at the time of submission of bid and at the time of acceptance of bid. If the bidder was validly registered at the time of acceptance / placement of order, registration shall not be a relevant during contract execution.

Any bidder, including an Indian bidder, who has a Specified Transfer of Technology (ToT) arrangement with an entity from a country which shares a land border with India will also be covered under this clause and will be required to be registered with Competent Authority.

“Transfer of Technology” means dissemination and transfer of all forms of commercially usable knowledge such as transfer of know-how, skills, technical expertise, designs, processes and procedures, trade secrets, which enables the acquirer of such technology to perform activities using the transferred technology independently.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and VJM & Associates LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Streamlining Company Registration in India: A Digital Transformation

How to Start a Startup Company in India

MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form

Others

MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form

As per Section 29(1A) of Companies Act read with Rule 9A of The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, every unlisted public company shall ensure that before issuance of any securities entire holding of securities of its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel has been dematerialised in accordance with provisions of the Depositories Act 1996. Further, every shareholder of an unlisted public company is required to dematerialise its securities before transfer, if such transfer is made on or after 2nd October, 2018.

23/04/2024 No Comments

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

Judgements

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

The petitioner is engaged in the business of generation of electricity through solar plants. The GST returns filed by the petitioner for the period of July, 2017 to March, 2019 were subject to audit. The petitioner was informed about tax liability during audit proceedings on account of wrong availment of ITC and ITC availed with respect to exempted supply. Upon receipt of initial audit observation, the petitioner discharged the entire tax liability alongwith interest. The final audit report was issued much after payment of GST liability. Post audit, the respondent issued show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 74 of CGST Act and confirmed the demand through DRC-07. The petitioner contended that it falls under purview of Section 73(1) and 73(5) of CGST Act and therefore, SCN under section 74 is not sustainable. Whereas, the respondent contended that this is the case of fraud and willful misstatement.

23/04/2024 No Comments

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Information

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Post COVID-19, there are many corporate entities which are allowing employees to work on Complete Work From Home (WFH) basis or on hybrid basis, i.e., Employees are required to come to office on selected days. This approach has reduced occupancy of physical premises by corporate offices and caused vacation of various rented premises.

23/04/2024 No Comments