March 5, 2024

CBDT Orders Remission of Outstanding Direct Tax Demands of Earlier Year | Union Interim Budget 2024

While processing Income Tax returns of FY 2022-23, most of the taxpayers faced issue of delayed refund, refund put on hold on account of outstanding demand, refund adjusted against outstanding demand etc. During FY 2022-23, due to digitalisation of Income tax records of earlier year, the department uploaded various demands of earlier years (much prior to the years when Income tax return was started filing online).

Assessee has no information and documents for such years and the refund claimed in ITR of FY 2022-23 is getting automatically adjusted to such outstanding demands. Considering the genuine hardship to the taxpayers, the Union Budget proposed to withdraw all direct tax demands upto INR 25000 till 2009-10 and upto INR 10,000 for year 2010-11 to 2014-15.

In line with proposals made in the Union budget, CBDT issued order vide F. No. 375/02/2023-IT-Budget dated February 13, 2024, announcing the remission and extinguishment of certain outstanding direct tax demands as per the Finance Minister’s budget speech for 2024-25.

Summary of order issued by CBDT is follows:

a. Remission/ Wavier of tax Demand of earlier year

Tax demand under Income Tax Act, 961, Wealth Tax Act, 1957 or Gift Tax Act, 1958, which were outstanding as on 31st January, 2024, is extinguished with effect from the date when such demands were created or modified:

Assessment Year/s (A.Y.) to which the entries of outstanding tax demands as on 31st January 2024 pertain	Monetary limit of entries of outstanding tax demands which are to be remitted and extinguished (in Rupees)
Upto A.Y. 2010-11	each demand entry upto Rs. 25,000/
A.Y. 2011-12 to A.Y. 2015-16	each demand entry upto Rs. 10,000/

B. Threshold Limit for remission

The remission and settlement of outstanding tax demand is subject to a maximum amount of INR 1,00,000/- per taxpayer/assessee for specific types of demand entries.

Principal tax demand under Income-tax Act, 1961 or relevant provisions of Wealth-tax Act, 1957 or Gift-tax Act, 1958.
Interest, penalty, fee, cess, or surcharge under relevant provisions of Income-tax Act, 1961 or corresponding provisions of Wealth-tax Act, 1957 or Gift-tax Act, 1958, if applicable.

Therefore, if outstanding tax demands including interest, penalty, fees, cess etc. is more than INR 1,00,000 then remission shall be granted upto INR 1,00,000 only.

C. Manner of computation of Maximum ceiling of INR 1,00,000

The remission and extinguishment of outstanding demands shall be done on a yearly basis, from the earliest assessment year to subsequent assessment year, for such year where amount of demand is within the specified monetary limit. However, the total value of these entries should not exceed Rs. 1,00,000/- per taxpayer/assessee.
Therefore, demand shall be remitted for the earliest year first.
If during any assessment year, demand is more than limit specified on yearly basis then such year shall not be considered for computation of limit of INR 1 Lac.
Further, under no circumstances, a fraction of any demand entry, whether its value is falling within the threshold limit of yearly basis or not, shall be considered for remission and extinguishment to compute the maximum ceiling of INR 1 Lac.

D. Other points

The remission and extinguishment granted under this order shall not be applicable to demands outstanding on account of TDS and TCS under Income Tax Act.
Following the remission and extinguishment of outstanding demand, interest calculation for delayed payment under section 220(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (corresponding provisions of Wealth-tax Act, 1957 and Gift-tax Act, 1958) is not required. Consequently, such interest amount shall not be considered for threshold limit of INR 1 Lac.
If any tax liability arises on account of provisions of Section 2(24)(xviii) of Income Tax Act, i.e., tax liability on subsidy, the same shall also be remitted and extinguished.
The remission and extinguishment of outstanding demand entries shall not :
- Confer any right to claim credit of any of the remitted and extinguishment demanded by the taxpayer under Income Tax Act, Wealth Tax act or Gift tax act or any other law, where such benefit or remission has been allowed to such assessee;
- Confer any right to claim refund of any sum by any taxpayer under Income Tax Act, Wealth Tax act or Gift tax act or any other law;
- Have the effect on any criminal proceedings pending or initiated against the Assessee under any law and shall not be construed as conferring any immunity, benefit, or concession in such proceedings, except as specified in this order.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and VJM & Associates LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Streamlining Company Registration in India: A Digital Transformation

How to Start a Startup Company in India

MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form

Others

MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form

As per Section 29(1A) of Companies Act read with Rule 9A of The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, every unlisted public company shall ensure that before issuance of any securities entire holding of securities of its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel has been dematerialised in accordance with provisions of the Depositories Act 1996. Further, every shareholder of an unlisted public company is required to dematerialise its securities before transfer, if such transfer is made on or after 2nd October, 2018.

23/04/2024 No Comments

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

Judgements

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

The petitioner is engaged in the business of generation of electricity through solar plants. The GST returns filed by the petitioner for the period of July, 2017 to March, 2019 were subject to audit. The petitioner was informed about tax liability during audit proceedings on account of wrong availment of ITC and ITC availed with respect to exempted supply. Upon receipt of initial audit observation, the petitioner discharged the entire tax liability alongwith interest. The final audit report was issued much after payment of GST liability. Post audit, the respondent issued show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 74 of CGST Act and confirmed the demand through DRC-07. The petitioner contended that it falls under purview of Section 73(1) and 73(5) of CGST Act and therefore, SCN under section 74 is not sustainable. Whereas, the respondent contended that this is the case of fraud and willful misstatement.

23/04/2024 No Comments

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Information

Establishment of Non-SEZ IT/ITES business in IT/ITES Special Economic Zones| Insertion of Rule 11B to SEZ Rules

Post COVID-19, there are many corporate entities which are allowing employees to work on Complete Work From Home (WFH) basis or on hybrid basis, i.e., Employees are required to come to office on selected days. This approach has reduced occupancy of physical premises by corporate offices and caused vacation of various rented premises.

23/04/2024 No Comments