To obviate dispute and litigation, CBEC vide Notification No. 41/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 14th November 2017 notified that irrespective of whether permanent transfer of Intellectual Property is a supply of goods or service: –
| Description | Rate |
| Permanent transfer of Intellectual Property other than Information Technology software | attracts GST @ 12% |
| Permanent transfer of Intellectual Property in respect of Information Technology software | attracts GST @ 18% |
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and VJM & Associates LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
As per Section 29(1A) of Companies Act read with Rule 9A of The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, every unlisted public company shall ensure that before issuance of any securities entire holding of securities of its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel has been dematerialised in accordance with provisions of the Depositories Act 1996. Further, every shareholder of an unlisted public company is required to dematerialise its securities before transfer, if such transfer is made on or after 2nd October, 2018.
The petitioner is engaged in the business of generation of electricity through solar plants. The GST returns filed by the petitioner for the period of July, 2017 to March, 2019 were subject to audit. The petitioner was informed about tax liability during audit proceedings on account of wrong availment of ITC and ITC availed with respect to exempted supply. Upon receipt of initial audit observation, the petitioner discharged the entire tax liability alongwith interest. The final audit report was issued much after payment of GST liability. Post audit, the respondent issued show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 74 of CGST Act and confirmed the demand through DRC-07. The petitioner contended that it falls under purview of Section 73(1) and 73(5) of CGST Act and therefore, SCN under section 74 is not sustainable. Whereas, the respondent contended that this is the case of fraud and willful misstatement.
Post COVID-19, there are many corporate entities which are allowing employees to work on Complete Work From Home (WFH) basis or on hybrid basis, i.e., Employees are required to come to office on selected days. This approach has reduced occupancy of physical premises by corporate offices and caused vacation of various rented premises.
Want to talk to us
Leave your Name, email, Phone number along with what you are looking for in message box or you can call us at 011-41715118
Keep up to date — get updates with latest topics. Signup for our newsletter today.
We serve on FDI advisory, cross-border accounting, International tax planning and Management consulting needs of our overseas clients all over the world.
Corporate Office: 601, 6th Floor, GMIT Park, Sector 142, Noida Exp Way, Noida – 201305
Registered Office: 44, Backary Portion, 2nd Floor, Regal Building, New Delhi 110001
Landline: 0120-4415477-78
info@vjmglobal.com
+91 9891576441, 9213397070, 9911887030
Mon – Fri: 09:00am – 06:00pm
Closed on Weekends
V J M & Associates LLP
