July 23, 2018

Why it is important to fill Part B of Eway Bill

In the recent order passed by High court of Madhya Pradesh in there order dated 05-07-2018, demand and penalties imposed Rs. 1,32,13,683 on M/s Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt Ltd by GST Appellate Authority & Joint commissioner of State Tax, Indore and Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Indore has been confirmed.

Facts of cases:

The vehicle of M/s Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt Ltd was carrying goods from Pune(Wadki), Maharashtra to Noida via Indore and other different places.
Inspection was carried out of their vehicle on 27.04.2018.
On enquiry, the driver (person incharge of a conveyance) of the vehicle produced the bill and challan.
E-way bill on enquiry, it was found that the petitioner Transporter company who was transporting the goods has not uploaded/updated the part-B of the e-way bill which is a required. Such act violated the provision of Sec 68 of CGST Act 2017 and Rule 138 of CGST Act 2017.
Consequently proceeding was initiated under Section 129 of the Act and penalty was imposed under Section 122 of the Act since he was transporting the taxable goods without the cover of documents.

Ground by M/s Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt Ltd

M/s Gati Kintetsu Express Pvt Ltd took ground that there was no intention on the part of the petitioner to evade payment of tax during Inter and Intra State Supply of Goods or services and due to technical error, part B of the eway bill cannot be updated.
This ground got rejected with the view that the portal of the GST provides for an option of grievance in case the petitioner was having any problem in updating the Part-B of the e-way bill. No such grievance has been raised by the petitioner and no written grievance has been raised with regard to the updating the technical error could not have been considered.
In case the Part-B is not updated, the e-way bill is not genuine/legal and therefore, it is not a minor mistake or cannot be treated as a technical error when there is an option of raising a grievance on the GST portal itself.

As per the provision of Rule 138 read with section 68 of CGST, every registered person carrying goods value more than Rs. 50000 needs to furnish detail of goods in Part A of e-way bill and needs to provide detail of conveyance in part B of e-way bill on the common portal before commencement of movements of goods.

In case of failure to furnish such details, penalties proceeding under section 122, 129 and 130 of CGST Act will be carried out.

Section	Penalties for not carrying E-way Bill
Sec 122(xiv)	Penalty for certain offence: A taxable person, Registered person and any person, transports any taxable goods without the cover of documents as may be specified in this behalf i.e. eway bill; shall be liable to a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- or tax sought to be evaded, whichever is higher.
Sec 129	Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyance in transit As per Section 129 of the CGST Act’2017, Where any person transport or store any goods, in contravention of this act and rules contravention, all such goods and conveyance and documents shall be liable to detention or seizure, shall be released with penalty;– Where the owner of the goods come forward to pay tax and penalties a. In case of Taxable Goods; 100% of the tax payable & penalty. b. In case of Exempted Goods; 2% of the value of goods or Rs. 25,000/-, whichever is less. c. Upon furnishing of security equivalent to amount above. Where the owner of the goods does not come forward to pay tax and penalties; a. In case of Taxable Goods; 50% of the value of the goods reduced by the tax amount paid, b. In case of Exempted Goods; 5% of the value of goods or Rs. 25,000/-, whichever is less. c. Upon furnishing of security equivalent to amount above i. No such goods or conveyance shall be detained or seized without serving an order of detention or seizure on the person transporting the goods. ii. No tax, interest or penalty shall be determined without giving an opportunity of being heard. iii. The goods so detained or seized shall be released, on a provisional basis, upon execution of a bond and furnishing of a security, or on payment of applicable tax, interest and penalty payable (section 67(6) – Power of inspection, search and seizure) iv. On payment of tax and penalties, all proceeding shall be deemed to be concluded. v. In case of non-payment of tax and penalties, further proceeding u/s 130 shall be initiated.
Sec 130	Confiscation of goods and conveyance and levy of penalties: Where the person transporting any goods or the owner of the goods fails to pay the amount of tax and penalty within 7 days of such detention or seizure, all such goods or conveyances shall be liable to confiscation and the person shall be liable to penalty as under a. Penalties which should not be more than market value of goods less tax there on b. Penalties which should not be less than penalties u/s 129(1) i. No order for confiscation of goods or conveyance shall be made without giving an opportunity of being heard.

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and VJM & Associates LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

GST Check-list you need to tick as stepping in new Financial Year

Cross-empowerment is without jurisdiction in absence of any notification under GST Law

Supply to goods for Job Work, have you filed your ITC-04

RoDTEP benefit is extended to EOU, AA Holders and SEZ Units

Streamlining filing of appeal by Department before ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court| Circular No. 5/2024 dated 15th March, 2024

Judgements

Streamlining filing of appeal by Department before ITAT, High Court and Supreme Court| Circular No. 5/2024 dated 15th March, 2024

Appeal against order of any authority can be filed by the party aggrieved by the order, i.e., the Assessee or the Department. Filing of appeal involves lots of cost and effort and also takes up the time of the judicial authority. Assessee files appeal after considering various factors such as amount of pre-deposit required, amount involved in dispute, time factor etc. However, for department appeal the CBDT specifies a monetary limit, i.e., upto specified monetary limit, no appeal shall be filed by the department.

09/04/2024 No Comments

GST Check-list you need to tick as stepping in new Financial Year

News and Announcements

GST Check-list you need to tick as stepping in new Financial Year

As we are stepping into the new Financial year, there are various compliance requirements which a taxpayer is required to do with the changing year. Any non-compliance on part of the taxpayer can lead to major disallowances or withdrawal of benefits from the taxpayer.
This article list down check-list which a taxpayer is required to tick as they enter into new financial year:

09/04/2024 No Comments

Cross-empowerment is without jurisdiction in absence of any notification under GST Law

Judgements

Cross-empowerment is without jurisdiction in absence of any notification under GST Law

The Writ petition was filed to challenge the proceedings initiated against the taxpayer by the central authorities where the taxpayer is assigned to the State authorities and vice versa. The Petitioner contended that power of cross-empowerment was given under Model GST Law. However, GST Law enacted is different from the Model GST Law.

09/04/2024 No Comments