GST Refund subsequent to favorable order in Appeal or any other Forum

gst cicular no 111

Goods and Service Tax (“GST”) provides an option to file an appeal against the order of lower authorities. Therefore, if the refund application of any taxpayer gets rejected or GST Refund out of Appeal then he may file an appeal with the next appellate authority. Rejection order is passed in form GST RFD-06.

CBIC received various representations asking to clarify procedure of claiming refund finalised through Appeals or any other Forum. Accordingly, CBIC has clarified such issue vide Circular No. 111/30/2019-GST about manner of handling such issue in following manner:

Procedure of handling GST Refund out of Appeal

1. Pre-requiste of filing appeal against GST RFD-06

  • As of now, appeals against rejection of refund claims are handled in offline form as electric mode is yet to be implemented.
  • As per Rule 93 of CGST Rules, if a taxpayer files appeal against rejection of refund order then he is not allowed to re-credit amount debited in Electronic Credit ledger till appeal is finally rejected.
  • Therefore, such amount in dispute remains debited in electronic credit ledger.

2. Application for claiming refund subsequent to favorable order

  • If favourable order is received, then registered person shall file a fresh refund application under ” Refund on account of assessment/provisional assessment/appeal/any other order”.
  • As corresponding amount involved has already been debited in electronic credit ledger, therefore, registered person shall not be required to re-debit such amount in his credit ledger at the time of filing fresh refund application.
  • Registered person shall be required to furnish following information and documents while filing refund application:
    • Type of order (Appeal/any other order)
    • Order Number
    • Order Date
    • Order Issuing Authority
    • Copy of order of appellate or other authority
    • Copy of refund rejection order in form GST RFD-06 issued earlier against which appeal was preferred

3. Procedure of granting refund by proper officer

  • Upon receipt of application, GST officer shall sanction the amount of refund as allowed in appeal or in subsequent forum.
  • Proper officer shall make an order in form GST RFD-06 and shall issue payment order in GST RFD-05.
  • Any amount of refund rejected in appeal or subsequent forum shall get re-credited in electronic credit ledger of registered person in accordance with guidelines given under Para 4.2 of Circular No. 59/33/2018-GST dated 04.09.2018

4.Illustration of GST Refund out of Appeal

ParticularsAmount (INR)
Application for refund filed in form GST RFD-011,000
Amount debited in Electronic Credit Ledger1,000
Refund allowed by Proper officer700
Refund Rejected by Proper Officer (Order in form GST RFD-06)- )(Amount not re-credited to electronic credit ledger)300
Amount for which appeal was filed300
Refund allowed by Appellate authority (GST RFD-06 and GST RFD-05)100
Refund Denied200
Fresh refund application is to be filed under ” Refund on account of assessment/provisional assessment/appeal/any other order”100
Amount to be re-credited to electronic credit ledger provided registered person is not challenging order in higher forum200

Notes:

  • FORM GST RFD – 01B under the original ARN which has so far not been uploaded will be uploaded with refund sanctioned amount as Rs.800/- (INR 700+ INR 100) and the amount to be re-credited will be Rs. 200/-.
  • If proper officer who rejected the refund claim originally (INR 1000) and proper officer handling fresh refund application (INR 100) are not same then the latter shall communicate to the proper officer who rejected the refund claim to close the ARN only after obtaining the undertaking as referred in para 4.2 of Circular no. 59/33/2018 – GST dated 04/09/2018.

Read more on Updated GST refund filing and claims process

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and VJM & Associates LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Related Post
MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form
Others
CA. Kavit Vijay

MCA imposed Penalty for failure to issue and transfer shares in Demat form

As per Section 29(1A) of Companies Act read with Rule 9A of The Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules, 2014, every unlisted public company shall ensure that before issuance of any securities entire holding of securities of its promoters, directors, key managerial personnel has been dematerialised in accordance with provisions of the Depositories Act 1996. Further,  every shareholder of an unlisted public company is required to dematerialise its securities before transfer, if such transfer is made on or after 2nd October, 2018.

Read More »
Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest
Judgements
CA. Sachin Jindal

Proceedings can’t be initiated under Section 74 when tax liability is already discharged along with interest

The petitioner is engaged in the business of generation of electricity through solar plants. The GST returns filed by the petitioner for the period of July, 2017 to March, 2019 were subject to audit. The petitioner was informed about tax liability during audit proceedings on account of wrong availment of ITC and ITC availed with respect to exempted supply. Upon receipt of initial audit observation, the petitioner discharged the entire tax liability alongwith interest. The final audit report was issued much after payment of GST liability. Post audit, the respondent issued show cause notice to the petitioner under Section 74 of CGST Act and confirmed the demand through DRC-07. The petitioner contended that it falls under purview of Section 73(1) and 73(5) of CGST Act and therefore, SCN under section 74 is not sustainable. Whereas, the respondent contended that this is the case of fraud and willful misstatement.

Read More »

V J M & Associates LLP

Contact Us

X